Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date: 2018-12-27 20:48:19
Message-ID: 317a714b-5056-4e4e-3911-9fd94ac3af5a@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 12/27/18 3:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/27/18 3:00 PM, John Naylor wrote:
>>> This style was cargo-culted from the catalog scripts. I can settle on
>>> just the first form if you like.
>> I would rather we used the standard perl module Getopt::Long, as
>> numerous programs we have already do.
> Hmm ... grepping finds that used only in
>
> src/tools/pgindent/pgindent
> src/tools/git_changelog
> src/pl/plperl/text2macro.pl
>
> so I'm not quite sure about the "numerous" claim. Adopting that
> here would possibly impose the requirement of having Getopt::Long
> on some developers who are getting by without it today. However,
> that's a pretty thin argument, and if Getopt::Long is present even
> in the most minimal Perl installations then it's certainly moot.

It's bundled separately, but on both systems I looked at it's needed by
the base perl package. I don't recall ever seeing a system where it's
not available. I'm reasonably careful about what packages the buildfarm
requires, and it's used Getopt::Long from day one.

>
> On the whole I'm +1 for this. Perhaps also, as an independent patch,
> we should change the catalog scripts to use Getopt::Long.
>
>

Probably some others, too.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-12-27 20:56:52 Poor buildfarm coverage of strong-random alternatives
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-27 20:34:13 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)