| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum |
| Date: | 2014-12-18 20:50:31 |
| Message-ID: | 3172.1418935831@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Great, thanks, pushed. I tweaked it a bit more, so that it would say
> either "skipped N pages" or "waited N pins" in both autovacuum and
> vacuum verbose cases, but only if N > 0.
Not directly relevant but ... I think probably all those BlockNumber
counters should be printed with %u not %d. A relation with between
2G and 4G pages is possible, and it wouldn't look right with %d.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-12-18 20:55:05 | Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-12-18 20:21:36 | Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum |