Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression
Date: 2023-01-26 20:12:16
Message-ID: 3166137.1674763936@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:43:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The symptom being exhibited by Michael's new BF animal tanager
>> is perfectly reproducible elsewhere.

> I think these tests have always failed with wal_compression ?

If that's a known problem, and we've done nothing about it,
that is pretty horrid. That test case is demonstrating fundamental
database corruption after a crash.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-01-26 20:13:09 Re: wrong Append/MergeAppend elision?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-26 20:08:27 Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression