| From: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active? |
| Date: | 2006-03-08 21:34:53 |
| Message-ID: | 315A9142-790A-4595-BF2A-0878E948DD79@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mar 8, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Chris Mair wrote:
>
>>> It is completely unrelated. The name is a (confusing) coincidence.
>>
>> Can we call it something else then? Anything else?
>
> Hi there,
>
> at last we came up with a new name: we'd like to call the project
> "protopg" (which would stand for PROprietary TO PostGresql).
> With all lowercase spelling.
>
> Josh,
> would that name qualify?
So do you intend to eventually support other databases? That'd be
cool (to say the least). How expandable is the current architecture?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-03-08 21:37:35 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-03-08 20:35:56 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |