Re: git: uh-oh

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 05:03, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> cvs admin -o ?
>>
>> Magnus, is this something that you can try? Prune those could of
>> wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to
>> running the conversion, and see how that comes out?

> Yes, definitely.

> Do we have list of exactly which revisions it is, or a good way to
> find it? Other than random browsing of the history? :-)

I think the files in question are these:

2007-04-16 21:05 tgl

* src/: backend/parser/gram.c, interfaces/ecpg/preproc/pgc.c,
interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.c: Temporarily re-add derived
files, in hopes of straightening out their CVS status.

2007-04-16 21:06 tgl

* src/: backend/parser/gram.c, interfaces/ecpg/preproc/pgc.c,
interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.c: And remove 'em again ...

Look at the histories of these in cvsweb, and try to zap the versions
that are later than the first FILE REMOVED event.

regards, tom lane