Re: Tuning/performance issue...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tuning/performance issue...
Date: 2003-10-04 03:58:14
Message-ID: 3151.1065239894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> I've often wondered if they win on those because they have a lighter
> weight parser / optimizer with less "lets try simplifying this query"
> steps or if the MYISAM storage mechanism is simply quicker at pulling
> data off the disk.

Comparing pre-PREPAREd queries would probably tell something about that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-10-04 09:00:04 Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function organized table layout (from Re:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-04 03:49:03 Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?