Re: Making the subquery alias optional in the FROM clause

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making the subquery alias optional in the FROM clause
Date: 2022-07-14 21:17:17
Message-ID: 3149278.1657833437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is an update with the following changes:

> * Docs updated as suggested.
> * transformLockingClause() updated to skip subquery and values rtes
> without aliases.
> * eref->aliasname changed to "unnamed_subquery" for subqueries without aliases.

This looks good to me. Marked RFC.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2022-07-14 21:21:03 Re: Issue with recovery_target = 'immediate'
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-07-14 21:09:02 Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures