Re: 9.4 failure on skink in _bt_newroot/XLogCheckBuffer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.4 failure on skink in _bt_newroot/XLogCheckBuffer
Date: 2016-05-23 02:18:58
Message-ID: 31425.1463969938@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2016-05-21 17:18:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What remains unclear is how come this only fails once in a blue moon.
>> Seems like any valgrind run of the regression tests should have caught it.

> Looks like a timing issue.

Yeah, I came to the same conclusion after awhile.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-05-23 03:22:18 Re: new tests post-feature freeze (was pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump)
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-23 02:13:03 Re: Adding an alternate syntax for Phrase Search