From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods |
Date: | 2016-05-27 13:53:56 |
Message-ID: | 313.1464357236@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As far as I can see, COMMENT ON has no support for access methods.
> Wouldn't we want to add it as it is created by a command? On top of
> that, perhaps we could have a backslash command in psql to list the
> supported access methods, like \dam[S]? The system methods would be in
> this case all the in-core ones.
I'm a bit skeptical that we need this yet. Maybe if custom access methods
become so popular that everybody's got one, it'd be worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-27 14:17:20 | Re: Allow COPY to use parameters |
Previous Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2016-05-27 13:41:41 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind |