Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods
Date: 2016-05-27 13:53:56
Message-ID: 313.1464357236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As far as I can see, COMMENT ON has no support for access methods.
> Wouldn't we want to add it as it is created by a command? On top of
> that, perhaps we could have a backslash command in psql to list the
> supported access methods, like \dam[S]? The system methods would be in
> this case all the in-core ones.

I'm a bit skeptical that we need this yet. Maybe if custom access methods
become so popular that everybody's got one, it'd be worth the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-27 14:17:20 Re: Allow COPY to use parameters
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2016-05-27 13:41:41 Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind