Re: alignas (C11)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alignas (C11)
Date: 2026-01-23 17:33:26
Message-ID: 3119480.1769189606@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> This patch set has been committed, it looks like without buildfarm
> complaints.

Things were fine until test_cplusplusext was added, but now
some older compilers seem to reject this in C++ mode.
For example at [1]:

make[1]: Entering directory '/home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/modules/test_cplusplusext'
g++ -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -O2 -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -I. -I/home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/test/modules/test_cplusplusext -I../../../../src/include -I/home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 -c -o test_cplusplusext.o /home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/test/modules/test_cplusplusext/test_cplusplusext.cpp
In file included from /home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/include/postgres.h:48:0,
from /home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/test/modules/test_cplusplusext/test_cplusplusext.cpp:18:
/home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/include/c.h:1126:44: warning: requested alignment 4096 is larger than 128 [-Wattributes]
alignas(PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE) char data[BLCKSZ];
^
/home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/include/c.h:1132:49: warning: requested alignment 4096 is larger than 128 [-Wattributes]
alignas(PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE) char data[XLOG_BLCKSZ];
^

Not sure what to do about that, but I do read it as indicating that we
cannot put any faith in the compiler to honor such large alignment
demands.

A possible short-term(?) workaround is to wrap those two declarations
in "#ifndef __cplusplus", so that C++ code can't declare such
variables.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=chimaera&dt=2026-01-23%2011%3A44%3A01&stg=make-testmodules

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2026-01-23 17:50:40 Re: Time to drop RADIUS support?
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-01-23 17:19:11 Re: Time to add FIDO2 support?