Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Yuya Watari <watari(dot)yuya(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date: 2022-11-07 06:25:58
Message-ID: 3115880.1667802358@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> I'm still in review of your patch now. At most it seems ok, but are you
> really need both eq_sources and eq_derives lists now?

Didn't we just have this conversation? eq_sources needs to be kept
separate to support the "broken EC" logic. We don't want to be
regurgitating derived clauses as well as originals in that path.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhang Mingli 2022-11-07 06:32:59 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message Andrey Lepikhov 2022-11-07 06:21:14 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions