Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Date: 2020-04-09 12:46:48
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/2/20 3:01 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Apr-02, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> I'm planning to mark this patch RwF on April 8 and I suggest you
>>> resubmit if you are able to get some consensus.
>> People interested in non-uniform benchmarks would see the point. Why many
>> people would be happy with uniform benchmarks only while life is not uniform
>> at all fails me.
> I don't think we should boot this patch. I don't think I would be able
> to get this over the commit line in this CF, but let's not discard it.

Understood. I have moved the patch to the 2020-07 CF in Needs Review state.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 曾文旌 2020-04-09 12:55:04 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Previous Message Juan José Santamaría Flecha 2020-04-09 12:14:31 Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019