| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jakob Egger <jakob(at)eggerapps(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG vs macOS Mojave |
| Date: | 2018-11-02 15:09:54 |
| Message-ID: | 31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use? We need to choose
>> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
>> wrap.
> #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
> possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.
I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it.
It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2018-11-02 15:34:07 | Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-02 15:02:38 | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces |