Re: configure && --with

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthias Apitz <guru(at)unixarea(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: configure && --with
Date: 2026-04-08 19:23:45
Message-ID: 3101339.1775676225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Matthias Apitz <guru(at)unixarea(dot)de> writes:
> El día miércoles, abril 08, 2026 a las 10:59:29a. m. -0400, Tom Lane escribió:
>> You don't actually need to worry about that. It's only trying to
>> report the result of "openssl version" for documentation's sake.
>> We don't use that executable for anything beyond that.

> Ok, fine with me. But the implementation of '--with-libraries' is wrong
> or at least the documentation needs clarification if this implementation
> is intentionally.

[ shrug... ] I do not think it's incumbent on us to work with
broken openssl installations. If your openssl doesn't cope
with being run without any special LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting,
you need to rethink how you're building it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre Barre 2026-04-08 20:50:54 Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance
Previous Message Matthias Apitz 2026-04-08 19:10:17 Re: configure && --with