Re: SQL procedures

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL procedures
Date: 2017-11-08 14:23:46
Message-ID: 30d523bb-19d6-35f0-970c-b2bc5ff27b18@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/31/17 16:50, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Not sure if disabling RETURN is good idea. I can imagine so optional
> returning something like int status can be good idea. Cheaper than
> raising a exception.

We could allow a RETURN without argument in PL/pgSQL, if you just want
to exit early. That syntax is currently not available, but it should
not be hard to add.

I don't understand the point about wanting to return an int. How would
you pass that around, since there is no declared return type?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2017-11-08 14:23:51 Re: SQL procedures
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-08 14:21:11 Re: SQL procedures