Re: Unnecessary smgropen in {heapam_relation,index}_copy_data?

On 25/01/2024 17:22, Japin Li wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 21:43, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I find heapam_relation_copy_data() and index_copy_data() have the following code:
>>>
>>> dstrel = smgropen(*newrlocator, rel->rd_backend);
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> RelationCreateStorage(*newrlocator, rel->rd_rel->relpersistence, true);
>>>
>>> The smgropen() is also called by RelationCreateStorage(), why should we call
>>> smgropen() explicitly here?
>>>
>>> I try to remove the smgropen(), and all tests passed.
>>
>> That's a very good question. Note that the second argument of
>> smgropen() used to create dstrel changes after applying your patch.
>> I'm not 100% sure whether this is significant or not.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> According the comments of RelationData->rd_backend, it is the backend id, if
> the relation is temporary. The differnece is RelationCreateStorage() uses
> relpersistence to determinate the backend id.

Committed, thanks!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)