Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/9/17 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27064.1134753128@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Good to know. That just says that if we were to go with the strcoll()
> result only, things would work correctly.
There's still the hashing problem.
regards, tom lane