Re: strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings
Date: 2017-06-09 15:46:34
Message-ID: 30938.1497023194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/9/17 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27064.1134753128@sss.pgh.pa.us

> Good to know. That just says that if we were to go with the strcoll()
> result only, things would work correctly.

There's still the hashing problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message konst583 2017-06-09 16:01:09 BUG #14699: Statement trigger and logical replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-09 15:45:58 Re: Something is rotten in publication drop