Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
Date: 2023-05-17 12:08:36
Message-ID: 3091457.1684325316@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Tom/Nathan, do you have any further suggestions here?

My recommendation is to revert this feature. I do not see any
way that we won't regret it as a poor design.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-05-17 12:37:30 Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch64 native spin lock.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2023-05-17 11:56:54 Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect