| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Lock partitions |
| Date: | 2006-09-11 15:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3078.1157988568@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It would be nice to see some results from the OSDL tests with, say, 4,
>> 8, and 16 lock partitions before we forget about the point though.
>> Anybody know whether OSDL is in a position to run tests for us?
> Yeah, I can run some dbt2 tests in the lab. I'll get started on it.
> We're still a little bit away from getting the automated testing for
> PostgreSQL going again though.
Great, thanks. The thing to twiddle is LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS in
src/include/storage/lwlock.h. You need a full backend recompile
after changing it, but you shouldn't need to initdb, if that helps.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2006-09-11 15:33:12 | Re: Proposal for GUID datatype |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-11 15:23:44 | Re: contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC |