Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: enable_joinremoval

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: enable_joinremoval
Date: 2010-03-29 21:56:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>>>> checking that.
>>>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output...  Seems simple enough.
>>> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
>>> answer.
>> Who complained about that exactly?  It seems like a perfectly
>> appropriate answer to me.
> Jaime Casanova.

i'm just finishing to read an 347 rows EXPLAIN ANALYZE, so yes i
prefer a DEBUG message than to hunt missing rels

Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-03-29 22:14:17
Subject: Re: Alpha release this week?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-29 21:05:48
Subject: Re: Alpha release this week?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group