Re: enable_joinremoval

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>>>> checking that.
>>>>
>>>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output...  Seems simple enough.
>>
>>> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
>>> answer.
>>
>> Who complained about that exactly?  It seems like a perfectly
>> appropriate answer to me.
>
> Jaime Casanova.
>

i'm just finishing to read an 347 rows EXPLAIN ANALYZE, so yes i
prefer a DEBUG message than to hunt missing rels

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157