Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, psql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Date: 2010-01-13 16:14:55
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1001130814t79b313dk4377996dee0ac521@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Well, what about when we're just doing EXPLAIN, not EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
> It'll add another line to the output for the expected number of
> batches.
>

and when we are in EXPLAIN ANALYZE the real number as well?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-13 16:23:00 Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-13 16:11:21 Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue