Re: set the cost of an aggregate function

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: set the cost of an aggregate function
Date: 2009-11-30 16:53:06
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0911300853t2778e9e5s7e29c9701f4965d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/11/30 Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>:
> Hi,
>
> why we can't do $subject? it could have any benefit on the planner?
>

seems like while we can set the cost of the state transition function,
that cost is not propagated...

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurent Laborde 2009-11-30 16:54:03 Cost of sort/order by not estimated by the query planner
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2009-11-30 16:51:22 Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication