Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Partitioning feature ...

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Kedar Potdar <kedar(dot)potdar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Gupta <amit(dot)pc(dot)gupta(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning feature ...
Date: 2009-03-30 14:59:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Kedar Potdar <kedar(dot)potdar(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>  As triggers are executed in order of their names, we've prefixed the
>> trigger names with "zz". This should work fine as long as no-one uses
>> trigger-name which starts with "zz".

this seems a lot fragile... why system generated triggers has to be
executed following the same rules (talking about order of execution)
as user triggers? can't we simply execute them first or last or maybe
be clever and mark one to be executed first and others last?

Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2009-03-30 15:01:58
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous:From: Andrew ChernowDate: 2009-03-30 14:59:04
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group