Re: Binaries vs Source

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Naz <lists(at)mrnaz(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binaries vs Source
Date: 2008-09-24 14:02:36
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0809240702p10e7c45p75ff77dcf5749975@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:52 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>> OTOH, if you install from sources you can install patches as soon as
>> they are committed... then you can always have your installation at
>> the most recent minor version... and of course more protected from
>> bugs.
>
> Heh :) So you assume that the patches are well-tested before committing,
> and they have no bugs?
>

eh! i was thinking in bug fixes...

> ...also what you wrote can be done easily with the binary packages.

really? how? at least i think i'll have to wait until the binary
package to be released

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-09-24 14:20:08 Re: Binaries vs Source
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-09-23 17:52:38 Re: Binaries vs Source

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2008-09-24 14:12:19 Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-09-24 07:33:48 Re: Bad link for win32/latest