| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee>, Justin <zzzzz(dot)graf(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to restore roles without changing postgres password |
| Date: | 2020-02-12 16:59:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3070.1581526786@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 2/11/20 11:31 PM, Andrus wrote:
>> Also I dont understand why GRANTED BY clauses appear in file. This looks
>> like noice.
>> GRANT documentation
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-grant.html
>> does not contain GRANTED BY clause. It looks like pg_dumpall generates
>> undocumented clause.
> It is not noise, see:
Indeed, but it's a fair question why it's not documented.
The clause does appear in the SQL standard:
<grant privilege statement> ::=
GRANT <privileges> TO <grantee> [ { <comma> <grantee> }... ]
[ WITH HIERARCHY OPTION ]
[ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
[ GRANTED BY <grantor> ]
so I suppose whoever added the implementation just forgot about
fixing the docs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-12 20:58:12 | Re: Getting our tables to render better in PDF output |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-02-12 16:39:27 | Re: How to restore roles without changing postgres password |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Igrishin | 2020-02-12 17:14:36 | Re: Natural sort order extension. |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-02-12 16:55:17 | Re: Natural sort order extension. |