Re: COPY Transform support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: COPY Transform support
Date: 2008-04-08 17:07:44
Message-ID: 3069.1207674464@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is there a big demand for multiple datasets on the wire in a situation
> like this? How about if we allow multiple COPY targets but at most one
> from STDIN, at least for one go round?

That's exactly what I was saying (or at least trying to imply) as the
fallback position. But you still need a way to enforce that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-04-08 17:08:51 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-08 16:59:56 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a