Re: ALTER TABLE modifications

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE modifications
Date: 2003-11-14 18:42:59
Message-ID: 3051.1068835379@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 18:51:
>> I don't recall that, but if so, I would like to revisit that consensus.

> [ Hannu disagrees ]

Please take this thread to pgsql-hackers; if the issue is going to be
contentious then we should try to get a wider spectrum of opinion than
just people who follow -patches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-14 18:47:17 Re: Background writer process
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-14 18:39:06 Re: cvs head? initdb?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-14 19:01:13 Re: [PATCHES] ALTER TABLE modifications
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 17:50:25 Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of