Re: Release cycle length

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release cycle length
Date: 2003-11-18 04:07:54
Message-ID: 3050000.1069128474@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 04:43:12 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Neil Conway writes:
>
>> That said, I'm not really sure how we can make better use of the beta
>> period. One obvious improvement would be making the beta announcements
>> more visible: the obscurity of the beta process on www.postgresql.org
>> for 7.4 was pretty ridiculous. Does anyone else have a suggestion on
>> what we can do to produce a more reliable .0 release in less time?
>
> Here are a couple of ideas:
>
> 0. As you say, make it known to the public. Have people test their
> in-development applications using a beta.
>
> 1. Start platform testing on day 1 of beta. Last minute fixes for AIX or
> UnixWare are really becoming old jokes.
The only reason we had last minute stuff for UnixWare this time was the
timing of PG's release and the UP3 release from SCO.

I try to test stuff fairly frequently, and this time I didn't know when,
exactly, SCO would make the release of the updated compiler.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 04:36:11 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-18 03:58:59 Re: Release cycle length

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 04:36:11 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-18 03:58:59 Re: Release cycle length