Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown
Date: 2019-04-29 17:50:26
Message-ID: 30485.1556560226@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Can you try applying a1a789eb5ac894b4ca4b7742f2dc2d9602116e46
>> to see if it fixes the problem for you?

> Yes, will give it a try on greenplum and report back the result.

> Have we decided if this will be applied to back branches?

My feeling about it is "maybe eventually, but most definitely not
the week before a set of minor releases". Some positive experience
with Greenplum would help increase confidence in the patch, for sure.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-04-29 17:52:19 Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples
Previous Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-04-29 17:44:00 Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown