| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Virender Singla <virender(dot)cse(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Aniket Jha <aniketkumarj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |
| Date: | 2026-02-25 18:58:11 |
| Message-ID: | 304751.1772045891@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sometimes I find it helpful to play with the message level and the
> primary message wording as a way of indicating the gravity, e.g.
> info: dumping grant of role \"%s\" to role \"%s\" without GRANTED BY,
> because role with OID %u no longer exists
> vs.
> warning: grant of role \"%s\" to \"%s\" has invalid grantor OID %u
> detail: this grant will be dumped without GRANTED BY
I'd be content to use those wordings (except I think our style
guide wants detail to be punctuated like a sentence). I'll wait
a day or so to see if anyone has a better idea, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2026-02-26 03:16:32 | RE: [BUG] Assert failure in ReorderBufferReturnTXN during logical decoding due to leaked specinsert change |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2026-02-25 18:47:52 | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |