Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently.
Date: 2022-09-15 01:38:40
Message-ID: 3043210.1663205920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The pg_upgrade part of this seems seriously awry (see buildfarm animal
> crake). We can't assume that the upgrade source is using the new wording.

Ugh. I'll look into a fix tomorrow --- but my first instinct is
that pg_upgrade shouldn't be so dependent on the exact wording of
pg_controldata output.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-09-15 01:57:28 Re: pgsql: Doc: Explain about Column List feature.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-09-15 01:19:41 Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently.