Re: pg_upgade vs config

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 10/02/2016 01:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Because pg_dump with --binary-upgrade neglects to emit
>> ALTER EXTENSION bloom ADD ACCESS METHOD bloom;
>> which it would need to do in order to make this work right. The other
>> small problem is that there is no such ALTER EXTENSION syntax in the
>> backend. This is a rather major oversight in the patch that added DDL
>> support for access methods, if you ask me.

> I agree.

Remarkably enough, it seems that only a gram.y production need be added
--- the only other code involved is objectaddress.c, which does seem
to have gotten extended sufficiently.

regards, tom lane