| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists |
| Date: | 2004-11-29 07:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3035.24.211.141.25.1101712650.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Doug McNaught said:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
>> No, the poster will still be included as part of the headers ... what
>> happens, at least under Pine, is that I am prompted whther I want to
>> honor the reply-to, if I hit 'y', then the other headers *are* strip'd
>> and the mail is set right back to the list ...
>
> I'm in the "Reply-To considered harmful" camp. I also don't see any
> real evidence that the current setup is causing problems.
>
And the historical document referred to can be found here:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
and an opposing view here:
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2004-11-29 07:27:57 | Re: How many views... |
| Previous Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2004-11-29 07:06:38 | Re: How many views... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-29 07:21:44 | Re: bug fix request |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-29 07:06:29 | Re: [GENERAL] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ... |