| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Denis Lussier <denis(dot)lussier(at)openscg(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
| Date: | 2013-12-05 01:02:38 |
| Message-ID: | 30225.1386205358@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:04:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If that's the argument, why not just use dblink or dbilink, and be
>> happy? This discussion sounds a whole lot like it's trending to a
>> conclusion of wanting one of those in core, which is not where I'd
>> like to end up.
> Telling people who've already installed and configured an FDW that for
> perfectly ordinary expected functionality they'll need to install yet
> another piece of software, configure it, keep its configuration in
> sync with the FDW configuration, etc., is just a ridiculous.
Perfectly ordinary expected functionality according to who? Not the
SQL standard, for sure.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-12-05 01:08:33 | Re: Changes in Trigger Firing |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-05 00:49:48 | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |