Re: Sanding down some edge cases for PL/pgSQL reserved words

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Behrens <jbe-mlist(at)magnetkern(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Sanding down some edge cases for PL/pgSQL reserved words
Date: 2025-06-30 21:08:37
Message-ID: 3019179.1751317717@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Looks so nobody has any motivation to do some deeper changes to reduce
> prohibition of reserved words. It is true, so in the real world it is not
> an issue.

Certainly anyone who's annoyed is free to do more work here.

> All tests passed without problems. I'll mark this patch as ready for commit.
> Maybe the usage of unreserved words as variables or field names can be
> tested a little bit more. See patch 0003

Pushed with the test case as you suggested. Thanks for reviewing!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-30 21:33:56 back-patch documentation for age() and mxid_age()
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2025-06-30 21:00:06 Re: Tags in the commitfest app: How to use them and what tags to add?