| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: numeric_big in make check? |
| Date: | 2024-02-20 13:46:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3014F290-5BE8-4397-9276-830D5DB0A297@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 20 Feb 2024, at 14:23, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If we did that, numeric_big would be even further down the list of
> expensive tests, and I'd say it should be run by default.
My motivation for raising this was to get a test which is executed as part of
parallel_schedule to make failures aren't missed. If we get there by slimming
down numeric_big to keep the unique coverage then that sounds like a good plan
to me.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2024-02-20 13:55:21 | Re: A new message seems missing a punctuation |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-02-20 13:34:57 | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |