Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to
>> recursive_worktable_factor? That seems a bit clearer as to what
>> it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area
>> if we decide we need any.
> None, I think your proposal is a better name.
Pushed that way.
regards, tom lane