Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date: 2016-06-20 02:05:47
Message-ID: 30052.1466388347@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
>> Here they are. Shelve them if you like. They are some of the least important
>> extensions that still should be fixed so they can end up in 10 if you do not
>> find the time.

> Thanks. I think it's too late to try to push anything else into
> beta2, with less than 24 hours to go before wrap. I'll just leave
> these for 10.0 unless I hear several votes for pushing them into 9.6
> post-beta2.

I agree with not pushing them right now, but I think it would be
sensible to push them post-beta2. There's already one certain
reason for a forced initdb after beta2 [1], so leaving these for
next cycle seems kinda pointless.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30448.1466190874@sss.pgh.pa.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-20 02:23:30 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-20 02:00:47 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered