Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs
Date: 2007-01-10 23:15:47
Message-ID: 3003.1168470947@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> what really is the motivation for keeping some of the tested binaries in the sourcetree when doing installcheck?

As opposed to what? We're certainly not going to *install* regress.so,
and I can't see requiring contrib to be there either. These are test
files, not part of the installation-under-test.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-01-11 00:44:28 Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-10 23:10:39 Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs