| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] HINT: pg_hba.conf changed since last config reload |
| Date: | 2015-01-16 17:39:44 |
| Message-ID: | 30023.1421429984@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2015-01-16 12:21:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think people felt that sending that information to the client wouldn't
>> be a good idea security-wise.
> It won't if issued during the right phase of the authentication:
Good point.
> But as I don't think sending logs to the client is a unsurmountable
> problem (due to the above) I don't really care if we use WARNING or LOG.
If we're expecting the DBA to need to read it in the postmaster log,
remember that LOG is actually *more* likely to get to the log than
WARNING is. Choosing WARNING because you think it sounds more significant
is a mistake.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-16 17:40:07 | Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-16 17:37:14 | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |