Re: Another planner/optimizer question...

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PGSQL hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another planner/optimizer question...
Date: 2001-11-02 00:02:55
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20011102110255.01fbb4d0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 10:22 1/11/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>The best I could offer
>you (short of a complete redesign of subqueries) would be to not pull up
>views that have any subqueries, which would probably be a net loss.

That's probably true 90% percent of the time; it would be interesting to be
able to turn this on & off on a per-query basis (or even a per-view basis).
Is this hard?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-11-02 00:48:38 Re: compiler warnings in ODBC
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-11-01 20:14:28 Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver