| From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>, "Doug McNaught" <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
| Date: | 2001-10-27 11:01:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20011027190133.018b4d00@192.228.128.13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 06:31 PM 10/24/01 +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>No, I don't want MySQL I want specific few chosen tables to be without
>transaction like: session table
>All the other tables (95%) must have transaction ... foreign keys ....
>inherits ... views .......
>
>I think it can be very beneficial to chop of portion of the code or even
>implant another system of tables into Postgres that will enable the most
>simplest fastest query.
>
>If the developers think that the speed increase is irrelevant then lets drop
>the issue :)
Just curious. Is MySQL faster or slower than Postgresql for what you want
to do fast now?
Cheerio,
Link.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dinesh Parikh | 2001-10-27 11:37:06 | Check Existence of temporary table in a session. |
| Previous Message | Marc SCHAEFER | 2001-10-27 10:08:52 | Sequential sequence numbers |