From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bad timestamp external representation |
Date: | 2001-07-27 02:18:56 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20010727121856.030e4100@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
At 15:13 26/07/01 -0700, Nathan Myers wrote:
>Should pg_dump be lossy?
No it shouldn't, but it already is because it uses decimal text reps of
everything; we lose data when dumping floats as well. In the latter case we
should dump the hex text reps to get the full bit width. Something similar
is probably true for times etc. It's just a lot less readable.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Samuel | 2001-07-27 05:21:17 | PL/PgSQL and arrays |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-07-27 00:49:20 | Re: Re: Running Postmaster - PGDATA Variable |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bob | 2001-07-27 02:31:22 | pltcl - lastoid |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-26 23:42:54 | Re: Bad timestamp external representation |