Re: Setuid functions

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setuid functions
Date: 2001-06-24 03:47:58
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010624134758.02356650@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


As a matter of interest, whatever happened to Perter's & Jan's plans for
setuid functions?

From memory, Jan's proposal was shelved in favour of something Peter had
previously proposed, is that right?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-24 05:06:03 Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-06-24 03:46:41 RE: Instrumenting and Logging in JDBC