Re: installing DBD::Pg without installing postgres

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: installing DBD::Pg without installing postgres
Date: 2001-04-24 01:46:20
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010424094620.00e2adc0@192.228.128.13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 04:30 PM 23-04-2001 -0400, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>It seems that there should be a way to install the DBD Pg module without
>having to install postgres on the local machine. I tried installing
>just the libs rpm, but that didn't seem to do the trick. I've done some
>usenet and mailing list archive searches, but all the info I'm turning
>up appears geared towards the assumption that you also want postgres
>installed locally. Am I looking in the wrong places?

My guess for installing DBD for any database is you at least need a client
install - libraries, headers.

But postgresql is actually quite easy to install, doesn't take tons of
space, plus there's no cost or licensing problem, so I just install the
whole thing.

Whereas I had a tough time installing DBD for Oracle a couple of years ago.

Cheerio,
Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message newsreader 2001-04-24 02:20:54 anyone else with mod_perl/apache and 7.1
Previous Message Randall Perry 2001-04-24 01:41:51 Re: Var substitution in SELECT statements