Re: speed on Postgresql compared to Mysql

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, Livio Righetti <livio(dot)righetti(at)mcnet(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: speed on Postgresql compared to Mysql
Date: 2001-04-09 02:03:13
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010409100313.00852100@192.228.128.13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 05:30 AM 08-04-2001 -0400, Joel Burton wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Livio Righetti wrote:
>> Also we used Postgresql for Radius (authentication) et we have to make 3
>> vacuum per day otherwise the first server is overload and the user go to
the
>> backup server.
>>
>> Is it normal or my Postgresql is not well configured ?
>
>Err, yes.
>
>Did you just do 40,000 inserts in a row, one after another? Realistic
>speed tests often have many requests coming in together, to simulate
>application- and web-usage.
>
>In addition, did you wrap this in a transaction? Otherwise, you're
>performing one transaction for *every single* insert, which is much slower
>than in a a transaction.
>
>(Generally speaking, if you want to just add 40,000 rows to a table, I'd
>use COPY, not INSERT ;-) )

I don't think COPY is useful or relevant in a normal ISP authentication
logging scenario.

Wrapping more than one insert doesn't help either. I think you would
normally want to commit each customer's transaction individually.

From his figures he can sustain about 136 inserts a second. Is that good
enough for peak loads at a medium to big ISP?

Cheerio,
Link.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-04-09 02:06:15 Re: linux/bsd
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-04-09 01:21:10 Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4