| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Constraint names using 'user namespace'? |
| Date: | 2000-11-27 23:09:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001128100959.02aade40@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just noticed this:
pjw=# create table pk1(f1 integer, constraint zzz primary key(f1));
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'zzz' for
table 'pk1'
CREATE
pjw=# create table zzz(f1 integer);
ERROR: Relation 'zzz' already exists
Is there a good reason why the automatically created items do not have a
'pg_' in front of their names?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mlw | 2000-11-27 23:28:36 | 8192 BLCKSZ ? |
| Previous Message | Norman Clarke | 2000-11-27 21:58:45 | postgres docs (was Re: Crash during WAL recovery?) |