Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change
Date: 2000-11-15 02:54:21
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001115135421.03492810@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 13:39 14/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>I've committed the template0/template1 changes we were discussing
>earlier. Plain pg_dump and pg_dumpall are changed to behave properly,
>but I didn't touch pg_backup or pg_restore; can you deal with those?

I still think that pg_dump needs to use the lastoid in template0 - did you
fail to implement this because you disagree, or because you think it should
use the current db lastsysoid?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-11-15 03:56:47 Re: IRC?
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2000-11-15 02:44:05 Re: Syslog Facility Patch