Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-09 12:40:56
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001109234056.00a37b20@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 08:59 9/11/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
>> Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on
>> ourselves when/if
>> CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA;
>
>I do not think this will be the way.
>

I know there was a lot of discussion of this a while ago, but was there a
consistant set of decisions made?

I'd be very interested if someone could post the current thinking re:
schemas, catalogs, and environments, because the way I read the SQL99 docs,
the catalog seems to correspond to a single postgres installation, and a
schema seems to correspond to a postgres database (ie. tables and views are
defined in a schema, and schemas are defined in a catalog, and catalogs are
defined in an environment, and it looks like the environment is akin to the
file system/implementation & postmaster).

Presumably this was raised before, but I'd love to see the consensus view,
if it is documented.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-11-09 13:08:22 Question about reliability?
Previous Message Karel Zak 2000-11-09 08:23:41 Re: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Query caching