Re: Last builtin OID?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Last builtin OID?
Date: 2000-10-22 02:54:25
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001022125425.039d2610@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 21:40 21/10/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>We could implement
>this by initializing the OID counter at 16384 as now, and then rewriting
>it to 32768 at the end of initdb.
...
>BTW, this raises a point I'd never thought hard about: if the dbadmin
>adds some site-local objects to template1, then makes databases that
>copy these objects, a pg_dumpall and restore will do the Wrong Thing.

Some kind of forced value would be good, although I would prefer the
'CREATE DATABASE' code to set a value in a table somewhere to the last OID
used when the DB was created. This would deal with the 'extended template1'
scenario (which, incidentally, I am already a victim of). Could a new
attribute be added to pg_database?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-22 05:16:39 Re: failed runcheck
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-22 02:17:04 Re: failed runcheck